Beranda  ›  Pericranium Continuous With Superficial Temporalis Fascia

Pericranium Continuous With Superficial Temporalis Fascia

Ditulis Senin, 24 Oktober 2022 Tulis Komentar Edit

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the morphological characteristics of the dura mater, the pericranium, and the temporal fascia to ascertain the most adequate tissue to use as a dura graft.

Methods

20 dura mater, 20 pericranium and 20 temporalis fascia samples were analyzed. Each of the samples was stained with hematoxylin and eosin, orcein, Van Gieson, Masson's trichrome and Verhoeff–Van Gieson (600 slides in total) for a general morphological evaluation, as well as a quantitative, morphometric and densitometric analysis of elastic fibers present in each of the tissues.

Results

The micro-densitometric analysis of the tissues indicated that the area occupied by the elastic fibers showed values of 1.766 ± 1.376, 4.580 ± 3.041, and 8.253 ± 4.467 % for the dura mater, the temporalis fascia and the pericranium, respectively (p < 0.05, all pairs). The values observed in the analysis of the density intensity were 3.42E+06 ± 2.57E+06, 1.41E+07 ± 1.28E+07, and 1.63E+07 ± 9.19E+06 for the dura mater, the temporalis fascia and the pericranium, respectively (p < 0.05), dura mater vs. temporalis fascia and dura mater vs. pericranium).

Conclusions

This is the first study to compare the dura mater with tissues for dural autograft and to quantify the elastic component present in these tissues. The results indicate that the temporalis fascia is a better dural graft because of its intrinsic tissue properties.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Indonesia)

References

  1. Abla AA, Link T, Fusco D, Wilson DA, Sonntag VK (2010) Comparison of dural grafts in Chiari decompression surgery: review of the literature. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 1:29–37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  2. Abul-Hassan HS, von Drasek Ascher G, Acland RD (1986) Surgical anatomy and blood supply of the fascial layers of the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:17–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  3. Augustin G, Antabak A, Davila S (2007) The periosteum Part 1: anatomy, histology and molecular biology. Injury 38:1115–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  4. Benetazzo L, Bizzego A, De Caro R, Frigo G, Guidolin D, Stecco C (2011) 3D reconstruction of the crural and thoracolumbar fasciae. Surg Radiol Anat 33:855–862

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  5. Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG (2001) Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells 19:180–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  6. Brown DL, Wedel DJ (1990) Spinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia. In: Miller RD (ed) Anesthesia, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 1379

    Google Scholar

  7. Caroli E, Rocchi G, Salvati M, Delfini R (2004) Duraplasty: our current experience. Surg Neurol 61:55–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  8. Chauvet D, Carpentier A, Allain JM, Polivka M, Crepin J, George B (2010) Histological and biomechanical study of dura mater applied to the technique of dura splitting decompression in Chiari type I malformation. Neurosurg Rev 33:287–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  9. Diaz-Flores L, Gutierrez R, Lopez-Alonso A, Gonzalez R, Valera H (1992) Pericytes as a supplementary source of osteoblasts in periosteal osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:280–286

    Google Scholar

  10. Filippi R, Schwarz M, Voth D, Reisch R, Grunert P, Perneczky A (2001) Bovine pericardium for duraplasty: clinical results in 32 patients. Neurosurg Rev 24:103–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  11. Fink BR, Walker S (1989) Orientation of fibers in human dorsal lumbar dura mater in relation to lumbar puncture. Anesth Analg 69:768–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  12. François P, Travers N, Lescanne E, Arbeille B, Jan M, Velut S (2010) The interperiosteo-dural concept applied to the perisellar compartment: a microanatomical and electron microscopic study. J Neurosurg 11:1045–1052

    Article  Google Scholar

  13. Fung YC (1981) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York, 19 & 260

  14. Habal MB, Maniscalco JE (1981) Observations of the ultrastructure of the pericranium. Ann Plast Surg 6:103–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  15. Haines DE, Harkey HL, Al-Mefty O (1993) The "subdural" space: a new look at an outdated concept. Neurosurgery 32:111–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  16. Henwood A (2003) Current applications of orcein in histochemistry. A brief review with some new observations concerning influence of dye batch variation and aging of dye solutions on staining. Biotech Histochem 78:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  17. Kleinman HK, Klebe RJ, Martin GR (1981) Role of collagenous matrices in the adhesion and growth of cells. J Cell Biol 88:473–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  18. Louis RG Jr, Tubbs RS, Mortazavi MM, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA (2013) Harvest of autologous clavipectoral fascia for use in duraplasty: cadaveric feasibility study. J Craniofac Surg 24:619–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  19. Martinez-Lage JF, Perez-Espejo MA, Palazon JH, López-Hernández F, Puerta P (2006) Autologous tissues for dural grafting in children: a report of 56 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 22:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  20. Midwood KS, Schwarzbauer JE (2002) Elastic fibers: building bridges between cells and their matrix. Curr Biol 12(8):R279–R281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  21. Patin DJ, Eckstein EC, Harum K (1993) Anatomic and biomechanical properties of human lumbar dura mater. Anesth Analg 76:535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  22. Postlethwaite AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH (1978) Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts by type I, II and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:871–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  23. Quirke TE, Fiorillo MA, Sharma PK (1998) The reverse temporoparietal fascia flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1338–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  24. Sato J, Sato H, Yamamoto T, Yokokawa N, Hiraga K, Mizuguchi T (1986) The mechanism of dural permeability to narcotics and local anesthetics. Jpn J Anesthesiol 35:917–923

    CAS  Google Scholar

  25. Shenoi PM (1982) Autogenous temporalis fascia grafts detailed light and electron microscopical observations on the effects of preparations. J Laryngol Otol 96:801–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  26. Simon TM, Sickle DC, Dennis H (2003) Cambium cell stimulation from surgical release of the periosteum. J Orthop Res 21:470–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  27. Sims DE (1986) The pericyte—a review. Tissue Cell 18:153–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  28. Squier CA, Ghoneim S, Kremenak CR (1990) Ultrastructure of the periosteum from membrane bone. J Anat 171:233–239

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  29. Suvarna KS, Layton C, Bancroft JD (2013) Bancroft's theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar

  30. Tellioğlu AT, Tekdemir I, Erdemli EA, Tüccar E, Ulusoy G (2000) Temporoparietal fascia: an anatomic and histologic reinvestigation with new potential Clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:40–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar

  31. Vanaclocha V, Saiz-Sapena N (1997) Duraplasty with freeze-dried cadaveric dura versus occipital pericranium for Chiari type I malformation: comparative study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  32. Vandenabeele F, Creemers J, Lambritchs I (1996) Ultrastructure of the human spinal arachnoid mater and dura mater. J Anat 189:417–430

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar

  33. Word Health Organization (1999) Infection control guidelines for transmisible spongiform encephalopathies. Report of WHO. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/who_cds_csr_aph_2000.3.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2015

  34. Wormald PJ, Alun-Jones T (1991) Anatomy of the temporalis fascia. J Laryngol Otol 105:522–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

  35. Yano H, Nishimura G, Kaji S, Murakami R, Fujii T (1995) A clinical and histologic comparison between free temporoparietal and scapular fascial flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:452–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Abraham G. Espinosa-Uribe MD, Claudia N. Esparza Hernández MD, Miguel A. J. Cruz-Elizondo MD, Luz Adriana Ramirez-Garcia MD, Maria del Carmen Theriot-Giron PhD, Sofia A. Carreño-Salcedo MD and Roberto Montes-de-Oca-Luna MD, PhD for reviewing the manuscript. We also thank the chemists, Evangelina Alvarez González and Griselda Laredo López, for their support and help in performing the staining used in this study.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (U.A.N.L.), Ave. Madero s/n Col. Mitras Centro, C.P.64460, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

      Rodolfo Morales-Avalos, José R. Bonilla-Galvan, Marcela Cardenas-Serna, Santos Guzmán-López & Rodrigo E. Elizondo-Omaña

    2. Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León (U.A.N.L.), Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

      Adolfo Soto-Domínguez, Jaime García-Juárez & Odila Saucedo-Cardenas

    3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste (CIBIN), IMSS, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

      Odila Saucedo-Cardenas

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Rodolfo Morales-Avalos.

    Additional information

    R. Morales-Avalos and A. Soto-Domínguez contributed equally in the study.

    Rights and permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Morales-Avalos, R., Soto-Domínguez, A., García-Juárez, J. et al. Characterization and morphological comparison of human dura mater, temporalis fascia, and pericranium for the correct selection of an autograft in duraplasty procedures. Surg Radiol Anat 39, 29–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1692-z

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1692-z

    Keywords

    • Dura mater
    • Duraplasty
    • Elastic fibers
    • Morphology
    • Pericranium
    • Temporalis fascia

    bosticnewd1957.blogspot.com

    Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00276-016-1692-z

    Belum ada Komentar untuk "Pericranium Continuous With Superficial Temporalis Fascia"

    Posting Komentar

    Langganan: Posting Komentar (Atom)

    Iklan Atas Artikel

    Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

    Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

    Iklan Bawah Artikel